Sockeye Blog Archives

Previously, we told you about House Republicans’ efforts to kill the ban on BPA in children’s products, which would keep kids safe from a pretty dangerous chemical. Today, we look at yet another bill Republican leadership has killed—another victim of corporate special interests. 

Last weekend, we honored those who’ve given their lives to protect our country, and with just a few weeks left in the legislative session, we thought it’d be a good idea to check in on the status of legislation aimed at helping veterans.

If you’re like us, and think that veterans deserve to be honored for the commitments and sacrifices they’ve made, you’re going to be disappointed by what we found.

Senate Bill 2 would do something obvious: It would make sure that veterans actually get Veterans’ Day off of work.

It was filed by Senate President Peter Courtney on behalf of a constituent, Lucy Van Oort, who asked a simple question. If legislators and public employees get Veterans’ Day off every year, why didn’t her late husband—a veteran—have the same guarantee?

Previously, we told you about House Republicans’ efforts to kill the ban on BPA in children’s products, which would keep kids safe from a pretty dangerous chemical. Today, we look at yet another bill Republican leadership has killed—another victim of corporate special interests. 

Last weekend, we honored those who’ve given their lives to protect our country, and with just a few weeks left in the legislative session, we thought it’d be a good idea to check in on the status of legislation aimed at helping veterans.

If you’re like us, and think that veterans deserve to be honored for the commitments and sacrifices they’ve made, you’re going to be disappointed by what we found.

Senate Bill 2 would do something obvious: It would make sure that veterans actually get Veterans’ Day off of work.

It was filed by Senate President Peter Courtney on behalf of a constituent, Lucy Van Oort, who asked a simple question. If legislators and public employees get Veterans’ Day off every year, why didn’t her late husband—a veteran—have the same guarantee?

SB 2 would set up a process that requires private employers to give veterans the day off—paid or unpaid—if the employees request it. The bill provided enough exemptions that it wouldn’t have been a burden on small employers, but would still have honored Oregon veterans. It sailed through the Senate committee, and was passed unanimously on the Senate floor. 

So why is this important, common-sense bill stalled? It’s been squashed by Rep. Sal Esquivel (R-Medford), co-chair of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, apparently on behalf of lobbyists for Associated Oregon Industries.

Associated Oregon Industries (AOI) is one of the state’s largest corporate lobbying organizations. They were one of the main opponents to Measures 66 & 67, and they’ve spent much of this legislative session lobbying for tax breaks for corporations and the rich.

AOI has been watching SB 2 on its list of bills that it called “Death by a Thousand Cuts.” Although AOI lobbyists were careful to not put their name on anything explicitly opposing the bill, sources inside the capitol have told us that AOI’s opposition is why Rep. Esquivel refused to move the bill out of his committee.

AOI opposes regulations on businesses, even when those regulations are meant to protect the health and safety of consumers and employees. They are apparently so opposed to business regulations that they are against a bill that would give veterans the day off of work on the one holiday we have to honor them. Maybe the bigger question, though, is why Rep. Esquivel is so willing to go along with them.

Just a few days before Memorial Day, Rep. Esquivel sent out an e-newsletter about an unrelated bill, with a subject line asking the question “Is it tough to be a proud American in Oregon?” Well, we ask, what’s more American than giving a little something back to those who’ve put their lives on the line?

If this legislative session is a test of legislators’ values and priorities, what does it say when a legislator chooses to stand with corporate lobbyists, rather than Oregon’s veterans?

Want to ask Rep. Esquivel why he’s decided to kill this bill? Give him a phone call or email him directly:

503-986-1406
rep.salesquivel@state.or.us

Happy Wednesday and the first day of June.

As the legislature enters its final calendar month of the session, cuts to youth corrections comes into focus, with the Oregonian editorial board (on Sunday) criticizing OYA cuts in the face of gang violence. Meanwhile, OPB reports that Oregonians depending on critical human service programs may get a reprieve from some of the proposed budget cuts, although deep reductions in basic services remain.

The petition to move the BPA ban to the House floor heats up. Today at 5pm is the last day for Representatives to sign on.

Happy Wednesday and the first day of June.

As the legislature enters its final calendar month of the session, cuts to youth corrections comes into focus, with the Oregonian editorial board (on Sunday) criticizing OYA cuts in the face of gang violence. Meanwhile, OPB reports that Oregonians depending on critical human service programs may get a reprieve from some of the proposed budget cuts, although deep reductions in basic services remain.

The petition to move the BPA ban to the House floor heats up. Today at 5pm is the last day for Representatives to sign on.

Hope you had a great long weekend!

As legislators consider digging deeper in the Education Stability Fund in order to lessen cuts made to local schools, new national figures are out showing that Oregon spends about 7% less per K-12 student than the national average.

Hope you had a great long weekend!

As legislators consider digging deeper in the Education Stability Fund in order to lessen cuts made to local schools, new national figures are out showing that Oregon spends about 7% less per K-12 student than the national average.

The proposed ban on BPA in children’s products is making a comeback, despite being blocked in committee by Republican leadership. House Democrats have launched a “discharge petition” in an attempt to force the bill to the House floor. 

Meanwhile, a package of bills designed to provide more oversight of the insurance industry is facing an uncertain future after opposition from industry lobbyists.

Happy Friday! The long weekend is almost upon us, and it may even be partly, temporarily sunny where you are.

The Oregonian reports that there is growing momentum in the legislature for tapping the Education Stability Fund in order to reduce the number of cuts school districts are facing. House Majority Leader Dave Hunt summed it up: "It's in the Education Stability Fund. Do we leave it under a mattress or invest it in our kids? I think that's an easy choice."

Meanwhile, a federal judge in Medford has blocked a foreclosure and issued a stinging rebuke of the mortgage industry's foreclosure practices. That sent industry lobbyists running to the legislature, looking to gut and stuff a bill in order to protect their procedures.

Happy Friday! The long weekend is almost upon us, and it may even be partly, temporarily sunny where you are.

The Oregonian reports that there is growing momentum in the legislature for tapping the Education Stability Fund in order to reduce the number of cuts school districts are facing. House Majority Leader Dave Hunt summed it up: "It's in the Education Stability Fund. Do we leave it under a mattress or invest it in our kids? I think that's an easy choice."

Meanwhile, a federal judge in Medford has blocked a foreclosure and issued a stinging rebuke of the mortgage industry's foreclosure practices. That sent industry lobbyists running to the legislature, looking to gut and stuff a bill in order to protect their procedures.

Did you miss the rally in Salem last Friday? You can check out a short video we put together of the event here: http://youtu.be/TAgzJi6GHdw.

Over the next few weeks, Oregon’s legislators will be making their final decisions about funding for vital state programs. Oregon’s $3.5 billion crisis poses a very real threat to basic services that middle-class families depend on, like schools, in-home care for seniors, services for people with developmental disabilities, and our public safety system.

We’ve spent weeks talking to people across the state and documenting what these cuts would mean. Click the photo below to hear how budget cuts would harm seniors in assisted living homes.

But at the same time, some lawmakers and corporate lobbyists want to make this crisis even worse, by pushing for tax breaks for the wealthy that would take even more money away from the services we value.

Over the next few weeks, Oregon’s legislators will be making their final decisions about funding for vital state programs. Oregon’s $3.5 billion crisis poses a very real threat to basic services that middle-class families depend on, like schools, in-home care for seniors, services for people with developmental disabilities, and our public safety system.

We’ve spent weeks talking to people across the state and documenting what these cuts would mean. Click the photo below to hear how budget cuts would harm seniors in assisted living homes.

But at the same time, some lawmakers and corporate lobbyists want to make this crisis even worse, by pushing for tax breaks for the wealthy that would take even more money away from the services we value.

As the Oregon Center for Public Policy noted earlier this week:

“Worse, some lawmakers — Republicans and Democrats alike — have pushed for repealing Measure 66 for those with income from capital gains. The only real winners would be speculators and the rich if income from capital gains were to receive special treatment. In 2009, over half of Oregon’s net capital gains income (54 percent) went to just 4,300 taxpayers who each made over $500,000 that year, the richest of the rich.”

In other words, many legislators are—at this very moment—proposing big tax breaks to a tiny percentage of the wealthiest Oregonians, while at the same time considering deep cuts that will lead to school closures, larger class sizes, seniors being denied in-home care, and cuts to critical services like air and water monitoring. 

Whose values and priorities will legislators stand up for? Will they stand up for middle-class families by limiting cuts to schools, senior care, and public safety? Or will they choose to stand with corporate lobbyists by giving tax breaks away to those who are still prospering even in this economy?

The next few weeks will be the legislature’s moment of truth. The way they—and all of us—respond to this crisis is a test of who we are as a people. Now is the time to speak out. Click here to find your legislators and urge them to stand up for middle-class families, not corporate special interests.

If you weren’t at the amazing rally in Salem last Friday, you really missed out. But luckily for you, we put together a short video to give you some sense of what you missed.  Click below to watch it!

It's Thursday. Yesterday, the Senate approved a bill to help homeowners facing foreclosure. Under this bill, the load modification process is less confusing and less complicated, and keeps banks from moving forward with a foreclosure while simultaneously working on a loan modification. It now heads to the House.

On the subject of bills that have stalled, area babies want to know what they ever did to Bruce Hanna and the Republicans to cause them to kill a bill that would protect them from dangerous chemicals.

Meanwhile, an update to the Bottle Bill is approved and awaits the Governor's signature.

It's Thursday. Yesterday, the Senate approved a bill to help homeowners facing foreclosure. Under this bill, the load modification process is less confusing and less complicated, and keeps banks from moving forward with a foreclosure while simultaneously working on a loan modification. It now heads to the House.

On the subject of bills that have stalled, area babies want to know what they ever did to Bruce Hanna and the Republicans to cause them to kill a bill that would protect them from dangerous chemicals.

Meanwhile, an update to the Bottle Bill is approved and awaits the Governor's signature.

Bruce Hanna and Republican Leaders Kill Bill: Part 1

And They Chose Corporations Over Kids!
This week, Oregon House Republicans killed a number of bills by letting the clock run out on them. Many of these bills have enough votes on the floor of the House to pass, but Republican leaders, including Co-Chair Bruce Hanna, R-Coca Cola, have refused to let them out of committee. Over the next several days, we’ll be highlighting some of these important bills and what they could have meant for Oregonians.

Senate Bill 695, which would ban the chemical BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups, has been blocked in the House by Republicans who refuse to hold a committee work session on it.

Why is this bill so important? Take it away, OLCV: “Bisphenol-A (BPA) is a dangerous, toxic chemical that is routinely found in plastic children’s food products like baby bottles, sippy cups, and infant formula cans.  Toxic BPA has been linked to several increasing children's developmental problems. “

Instead of voting to protect children by banning this harmful chemical in children’s products, Republican leaders have put the brakes on the bill. Why would that be? Kari Chisholm at Blue Oregon has an interesting take:

Bruce Hanna and Republican Leaders Kill Bill: Part 1

And They Chose Corporations Over Kids!
This week, Oregon House Republicans killed a number of bills by letting the clock run out on them. Many of these bills have enough votes on the floor of the House to pass, but Republican leaders, including Co-Chair Bruce Hanna, R-Coca Cola, have refused to let them out of committee. Over the next several days, we’ll be highlighting some of these important bills and what they could have meant for Oregonians.

Senate Bill 695, which would ban the chemical BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups, has been blocked in the House by Republicans who refuse to hold a committee work session on it.

Why is this bill so important? Take it away, OLCV: “Bisphenol-A (BPA) is a dangerous, toxic chemical that is routinely found in plastic children’s food products like baby bottles, sippy cups, and infant formula cans.  Toxic BPA has been linked to several increasing children's developmental problems. “

Instead of voting to protect children by banning this harmful chemical in children’s products, Republican leaders have put the brakes on the bill. Why would that be? Kari Chisholm at Blue Oregon has an interesting take:

____________________________________________

"I’m not privy to all the wheeling and dealing down there on this particular bill, but it occurs to me that the primary opponents of this bill are the people who make packaging products -- and the Republican co-Speaker, Bruce Hanna, is the president of Roseburg Coca-Cola Bottling Company.

Coke's support for using Bisphenol-A is so strong that activist website Change.org called Coke "one of the most notoriously pro-BPA companies" last year.

How bad is Coke's stubborn behavior? Earlier this year, at the company's annual meeting, 26% of Coke shareholders voted to stop using Bisphenol-A. And yet, Coke continues to cling to the toxic substance. (At most companies a 10% shareholder vote is enough to spark changes.)

So, here's what I want to know: Has Bruce Hanna excused himself from the internal deliberations over Senate Bill 695? He's got a pretty darn clear conflict of interest as a major user of the toxic substance in his business."

____________________________________________

The good news is that all is not lost. Next Tuesday, Co-Speaker Hanna will be attending a town hall in Washington County along with Republican Senator Bruce Starr and Republican Reps. Shawn Lindsay and Katie Eyre-Brewer. OLCV is encouraging supporters of the BPA ban to show up at the event and demand to know why Hanna is playing politics with the health and safety of our children.

What: Town Hall with Speaker Bruce Hanna, Senator Bruce Starr, and Representatives Shawn Lindsay and Katie Eyre-Brewer.

Where: Hillsboro Civic Auditorium
150 E. Main Street, Hillsboro, OR

When: Tuesday, May 31 at 6:30 p.m

Happy rainy Wednesday! Willamette Week questions The Oregonian's new partnership with the Cascade Policy Institute's Oregon Capitol News, pointing out that OCN is a project of Cascade Policy Institute, not an independent news outlet.

More impacts of budget cuts become apparent, with KATU covering the threats to Oregon Project Independence and Oregon City News highlighting the cuts to Oregon City schools that are being proposed due to state budget cuts and the loss of their local bond.

With those and many other deep cuts being proposed in the legislature, Chuck Sheketoff asks on Blue Oregon "Will Lawmakers Prioritize Oregon's Middle Class?" The question is whose priorities legislators will choose, struggling families or corporate lobbyists?

Happy rainy Wednesday! Willamette Week questions The Oregonian's new partnership with the Cascade Policy Institute's Oregon Capitol News, pointing out that OCN is a project of Cascade Policy Institute, not an independent news outlet.

More impacts of budget cuts become apparent, with KATU covering the threats to Oregon Project Independence and Oregon City News highlighting the cuts to Oregon City schools that are being proposed due to state budget cuts and the loss of their local bond.

With those and many other deep cuts being proposed in the legislature, Chuck Sheketoff asks on Blue Oregon "Will Lawmakers Prioritize Oregon's Middle Class?" The question is whose priorities legislators will choose, struggling families or corporate lobbyists?

It's Tuesday. As the legislative session begins its final few weeks, a number of bills are going on life support. One of those, SB 695, which would ban the use of the chemical BPA in products like baby bottles, was still waiting for a work session when an internal committee deadline came and went yesterday evening.

Kari Chisholm at Blue Oregon wonders if the bill, which had broad, bipartisan support--but staunch opposition from corporations like Coca Cola--fell victim to Republican Co-Speaker Bruce Hanna, who's also the president of Roseburg Coca-Cola Bottling Company.

It's Tuesday. As the legislative session begins its final few weeks, a number of bills are going on life support. One of those, SB 695, which would ban the use of the chemical BPA in products like baby bottles, was still waiting for a work session when an internal committee deadline came and went yesterday evening.

Kari Chisholm at Blue Oregon wonders if the bill, which had broad, bipartisan support--but staunch opposition from corporations like Coca Cola--fell victim to Republican Co-Speaker Bruce Hanna, who's also the president of Roseburg Coca-Cola Bottling Company.

Since Tuesday’s election, there’s been a prevailing storyline in the press that local ballot measures lost big, and that the results were caused by economically pinched voters being unwilling to raise their own taxes.

A frontpage headline in yesterday’s Oregonian is a perfect example:  “Economy big factor in school bonds’ fall: Around the state and even in tax-receptive Portland, voters decide they just can’t afford more taxes.”

Since Tuesday’s election, there’s been a prevailing storyline in the press that local ballot measures lost big, and that the results were caused by economically pinched voters being unwilling to raise their own taxes.

A frontpage headline in yesterday’s Oregonian is a perfect example:  “Economy big factor in school bonds’ fall: Around the state and even in tax-receptive Portland, voters decide they just can’t afford more taxes.”

But an analysis of the election numbers conducted by Our Oregon reveals wide support among voters for protecting schools and local services, like police and fire protection.

Of the 47 tax measures that were on local ballots, 19 were approved by voters, with one—the Parkrose Bond—still too close to call. The measures that passed were in every corner of the state. There were Yes victories on school measures from Portland to Newberg to Bandon, and public safety levies from Klamath to Scappoose.

But when we tallied the numbers for all the yes votes and all the no votes for all of the local measures, we found something even more telling—and perhaps more surprising.

There were 329,667 Yes votes in favor of higher taxes or extending taxes in order to fund schools, libraries, museums, and/or public safety needs like fire stations. On these same measures, there were 342,810 No votes. That's difference of 49% to 51%--really, a very close margin.

What does that mean? Even in this economy, there were almost as many votes in favor of taxes as there were opposed—and these were broad-based taxes, not progressive or targeted taxes. 

These numbers fly in the face of the prevailing narrative about Tuesday’s election, and show that voters around the state are willing to step up to protect their local schools and critical services. If the measures had been targeted to impact only those who are still doing well in the economy, the numbers would have been even higher.